14 April 2009

Principles of Radiation Oncology



Principles of Radiation Oncology
by
Michael Underbrink, MD
Anna Pou, MD

Introduction

* Increasing use for head and neck cancer
* Combined or as single modality
* Outline basic principles, radiobiology
* General treatment approach
* Common complications

Radiation Physics

* Basis – ionizing particles interact with cellular molecules
* Relies on transfer of energy created by secondary charged particles (usually electrons)
* Break chemical bonds
* External beam vs. Brachytherapy
* Radiant energy is discrete yet random

External Beam Irradiation

* Dual-energy linear accelerators generate:
o Low energy megavoltage x-rays (4-6 MeV)
o High energy x-rays (15-20 MeV)
o Photon energy
* Particle Radiation (electrons, protons, neutrons)
* Photon therapy advantages
o Skin sparing, penetration, beam uniformity
* Head and Neck sites – 4-6 MeV x-ray or Co60 gamma ray radiation

External Beam Irradiation
Brachytherapy

* Radioactive source in direct contact with tumor
o Interstitial implants, intracavitary implants or surface molds
* Greater deliverable dose
* Continuous low dose rate
* Advantage for hypoxic or slow proliferators
* Shorter treatment times

Brachytherapy

* Limitations
o Tumor must be accessible
o Well-demarcated
o Cannot be only modality for tumors with high risk of regional lymph node metastasis


Radiobiology

* Ionizing radiation ejects an electron from a target molecule
* Distributed randomly within cell
* Double-strand DNA breaks – lethal
* Cell death: no longer able to undergo unlimited cell division
* Direct vs. Indirect injury (free radicals – O2)
* Inadequate cellular repair mechanisms implied

Radiobiology

* Random cell death
o Deposition of energy & injury is random event
o Same proportion of cells is damaged per dose
o 100 to 10 cell reduction = 106 to 105 cell reduction
o Larger tumors require more radiation
o 105 cells = nonpalpable
o Applies to normal tissue also
* Therapeutic advantage – 4 R’s of radiobiology

4 R’s of radiation biology

* Repair of cellular damage
* Reoxygenation of the tumor
* Redistribution within the cell cycle
* Repopulation of cells

Repair of sublethal injury

* Sublethal injury – cells exposed to sparse ionization fields, can be repaired
* Killing requires greater total dose when given in several fractions
* Most tissue repair in 3 hours, up to 24 hours
* Allows repair of injured normal tissue, potential therapeutic advantage over tumor cells
* Radioresistance – melanoma?

Reoxygenation

* Oxygen stabilizes free radicals
* Hypoxic cells require more radiation to kill
* Hypoxic tumor areas
o Temporary vessel constriction from mass
o Outgrow blood supply, capillary collapse
* Tumor shrinkage decreases hypoxic areas
* Reinforces fractionated dosing
* Hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, selective chemo


Redistribution

* Cell cycle position sensitive cells
* S phase – radioresistant
* G2 phase delay = increased radioresistance
* RAD9 gene mutation – radiosensitive yeast
* H-ras and c-myc oncogenes - G2 delay
* Fractionated XRT redistributes cells
* Rapid cycling cells more sensitive (mucosa, skin)
* Slow cyclers (connective tissue, brain) spared

Repopulation

* Increased regeneration of surviving fraction
* Rapidly proliferating tumors regenerate faster
* Determines length and timing of therapy course
* Regeneration (tumor) vs. Recuperation (normal)
* Reason for accelerated treatment schedules
* Reason against:
o Treatment delay
o Protracted XRT, split course XRT (designed delay)

Dose-Response Relations

* Control probability variables
o Tumor size
o XRT dose
* Favorable response curves
o Small, well-vascularized tumors
o Homogeneous tumors
* Unfavorable response curves
o Large, bulky tumors (hypoxia)
o Heterogeneous, variable cell numbers
* Normal tissue injury risk increases with XRT dose (size of tumor)

Fractionation Schedules

* Conventional
o 1.8 to 2.0 Gy given 5 times/week
o Total of 6 to 8 weeks
o Effort to minimize late complications
* Accelerated fractionation
o 1.8 to 2.0 Gy given bid/tid
o Similar total dose (less treatment time)
o Minimize tumor repopulation (increase local control)
o Tolerable acute complications (increased)
* Hyperfractionation
o 1.0 to 1.2 Gy bid/tid, 5 times/week
o Similar total treatment time (increased total dose)
o Increases total dose
o Potentially increases local control
o Same rates of late complications
o Increased acute reactions

Treatment Principles

* Size and location of primary
* Presence/absence and extent/incidence of regional or distant metastasis
* General condition of patient
* Early stage cancers
o Surgery alone = XRT alone
o Treatment choice depends on functional deficits
* Late stage – usually combination of treatments
* Surgical salvage of primary radiation failures is better than radiation salvage of surgical failure
* Explains rationale behind organ preservation strategies
* XRT tumor cell killing is exponential function
o Dose required for tumor control is proportional to the logarithm of the number of viable cells in the tumor

Shrinking field technique

* Initial dose = 45 to 50 Gy (4.5 to 5.0 weeks)
o Given through large portals
o Covers areas of possible regional metastasis and primary
* Second dose = 15 to 25 Gy (1.5 to 2.5 weeks)
o Boost field (gross tumor and small margin)
o Total dose of 60 to 75 Gy in 6 to 7.5 weeks
* Boost dose = 10 to 15 Gy
o Massive tumors
o Second field reduction at 60 to 65 Gy
o Total of 7 to 8 weeks

Combined Modalities

* Surgery and XRT complement each other
* Surgery – removes gross tumor (bulky tumors are more difficult to control with XRT)
* XRT – effective for microscopic disease, better with exophytic tumors than ulcerative ones (Surgical failures may leave subclinical disease)
* Combining treatments counteracts limitations
* Pre or Post-operative XRT

Preoperative XRT

* Advantages
o Unresectable lesions may become resectable
o Extent of surgical resection diminished
o Smaller treatment portals
o Microscopic disease more radiosensitive (blood supply)
o Decreased risk of distant metastasis from surgical manipulation?
* Disadvantages
o Decreased wound healing
o Decreased safe dose (45 Gy in 4.5 weeks eradicates subclinical disease in 85% to 90% of patients)
* Advantages
o Better surgical staging
o Greater dose can be given safely (60 to 65 Gy in 6 to 7 weeks)
o Total dose can be based on residual tumor burden
o Surgical resection is easier
o Tissue heals better
* Disadvantages
o Distant metastasis by manipulation?
o Delay in postoperative treatment if healing problems (poorer results if delayed more than 6 weeks)

Complications

* Acute Tissue Reactions
* Late Tissue Reactions

Acute Toxicity

* Time onset depends on cell cycling time
* Mucosal reactions – 2nd week of XRT
* Skin reactions – 5th week
* Generally subside several weeks after completion of treatment

* RTOG – acute toxicity <90>PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY

Read more...

Challenges in Optimal Delivery of Radiation in Head and Neck Cancers



Challenges in Optimal Delivery of Radiation in Head and Neck Cancers
by
Dr. J P Agarwal, Associate Professor
Department of Radiation Oncology
Tata Memorial Hospital, India

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
General Management Guidelines for H & N Cancers
Head And Neck Radiotherapy
Optimal Dose Delivery With Minimum Acute And Long Term Toxicity
The changing paradigm Wide field radiation Conformal radiation
Head and Neck Immobilization devices
Verification Of Patient Positioning
Immobilization and Set Up Uncertainties
Guidelines For Target Volume Delineation
Heterogeneity In Target Volume Delineation
PET CT Fusion And Effect On PTV

and more topics are in this presentation.


Read more...

British Journal of Cancer Free Access



British Journal of Cancer Free Access

Free access to all issues prior to one year.

Coinciding with the release of the first issue of Volume 99 of BJC on 1st July 2008, and the launch of our new website design, BJC, NPG and Cancer Research UK are pleased to announce that all BJC papers will become freely available to readers of this website, 12 months after they are published in an online issue.

Later in 2009, BJC will release the remainder of its back issues, dating from the founding of BJC as a quarterly publication in 1947, to 1998.

These issues have been prepared for digital publication with the support of the Wellcome Trust, working in partnership with the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), and the US National Library of Medicine (NLM), where they will also be available.

Nature.com

Read more...
All links posted here are collected from various websites. No video or powerpoint files are uploaded on this blog. If you are the original author and do not wish to display your content on this blog please Email me anandkumarreddy at gmail dot com I will remove it. The contents of this blog are meant for educational purpose and not for commercial use. If you use any content give due credit to the original author.

This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services, to personalise ads and to analyse traffic. Information about your use of this site is shared with Google. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP